Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasper P. Logan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7/G11/WP:TOOSOON The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jasper P. Logan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. No coverage found whatsoever. Speedy deletion tag for spam (G11) repeatedly removed, so I'm listing it here. schetm (talk) 06:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Non-notable self-promotion. Article contributors all since blocked for vandalism and sockpuppetry. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 07:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:09, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. It's exciting to see young people with political aspirations, but this individual is simply not notable. If the article is not a simple self-promotional page, it is at the very least entirely original research (citing a Facebook post and a Youtube video - without links), and it just doesn't belong. --Azure Anteater (talk) 07:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A7. The only thing even resembling a claim of importance is self-announced candidacy for Congress in 2024. —teb728 t c 07:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

... and that's not just WP:TOOSOON, but WP:CRYSTAL. ^~~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~~ 07:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete because this article is no source.--Shwangtianyuan (talk) 07:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G11 & probably A7. I've restored the speedy tag that had been repeatedly removed by socks. --Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 08:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.